- City Officials
- Mary Zendejas1st District
- Cindy Allen2nd District
- Kristina Duggan3rd District
- Daryl Supernaw4th District
- Megan Kerr5th District
- Suely Saro6th District
- Roberto Uranga7th District
- Al Austin8th District
- Dr. Joni Ricks-Oddie9th District
- Dawn McIntoshCity Attorney
- Laura L. DoudCity Auditor
- Doug HaubertCity Prosecutor
- Tom ModicaCity Manager
- Monique DeLaGarzaCity Clerk
- Services
- Businesses
- Residents
- Visitors
- Departments
- Jobs
Mayor
City Council
Rex Richardson
Mary Zendejas
1st District
Cindy Allen
2nd District
Kristina Duggan
3rd District
Daryl Supernaw
4th District
Megan Kerr
5th District
Suely Saro
6th District
Roberto Uranga
7th District
Al Austin
8th District
Dr. Joni Ricks-Oddie
9th District
Dawn McIntosh
City Attorney
Laura L. Doud
City Auditor
Doug Haubert
City Prosecutor
Tom Modica
City Manager
Monique DeLaGarza
City Clerk
City-Wide Elected Officials
Appointed Officials
Departments
Community Development
- LBCD Home
- About Us
- Services
- Building Permits
- Building & Safety Fee Schedule
- Construction Code Resources and Documents
- Deputy Inspector Program
- Online Permits
- Plan Review Status/Permit Status/Records
- Planning/Zoning
- Planning Fee Schedule
- Planning Permits
- Program for Building Projects
- Project Plan Review and Submittal Service
- Schedule Building Inspection
- Resources & Forms
- Programs & Projects
- Maps
Permitting/Planning
Historic District Design Guidelines
Design Guidelines and Architectural Style Guides
- Chapter 1 - Purpose, Procedures, Overview of Program - Adopted
- Chapter 2 - Guidelines for Maintenance, Repair and Minor Alterations - Adopted
- Chapter 3 - Design Guidelines by District
3.1 Belmont Heights - Adopted
3.2 Bluff Heights - Adopted
3.3 Bluff Park - Adopted
3.4 Brenner Place - Adopted
3.5 California Heights - Adopted
3.6 Carroll Park - Adopted
3.8 Eliot Lane - Adopted
3.9 Hellman Street Craftsman - Adopted
3.10 Linden Ave - Adopted
3.11 Lowena Drive - Adopted
3.12 Minerva Place - Adopted
3.13 Rose Park - Adopted
3.14 Rose Park South - Adopted
3.15 Sunrise Boulevard - Adopted
3.16 Wilton Street - Adopted
3.17 Wrigley - Adopted
Coming soon: Drake Park/Willmore City - Chapter 4 - Architectural Style Guide
4.1 American Foursquare: 1894-1910 - Adopted
4.2 Colonial Revival: 1876-1965 - Adopted
4.3 Craftsman: 1902-1925 - Adopted
4.4 Folk Victorian: 1870-1910 - Adopted
4.5 French Eclectic: 1915-1942 - Adopted
4.6 Mediterranean Revival: 1919-1950 - Adopted
4.7 Minimal Traditional: 1930-1950 - Adopted
4.8 Prairie Style: 1900-1942 - Adopted
4.9 Spanish Colonial Revival:1915-1942 - Adopted
4.10 Streamline Moderne: 1934-1945 - Adopted
4.11 Tudor Revival: 1900-1943 - Adopted
Coming soon: Other architectural style guides will be developed through this process, such as Midcentury Modern (1945-1970s), Neoclassical (1900-1930), Queen Anne (1885-1910) - Chapter 5 - Resources
5.1 Paint Samples for Craftsman, Colonial Revival and Victorian
5.2 Resource List: A referral list from Long Beach Heritage, including architects, contractors, painters, roofers etc.
5.3 Window Referral List
Response to Comments:
Click below to review the public feedback for each of the adopted and proposed historic district design guidelines and a response to each comment, indicating if and how the comment was incorporated into the adopted design guidelines. Changes to the final guidelines also reflect feedback from the Cultural Heritage Commission; you can view video the Commission discussions by clicking here.
- Response to Comments for Group 5: California Heights.
- Response to Comments for Group 4: Bluff Park and Bluff Heights
- Response to Comments for Group 3: Carroll Park, Linden Ave, Lowena Dr., Sunrise Blvd, and Wrigley
- Response to Comments for Group 2: Belmont Heights, Hellman St., Rose Park and Rose Park South
- Response to Comments for Group 1: Brenner Pl, Eliot Ln, Minerva Place, and Wilton St.
Some of the ways this can be accomplished include:
- Placing the new addition on an inconspicuous side or rear elevation so that the new work does not result in a radical change to the form and character of the historic building
- Setting an infill addition or connector back from the historic building wall plane so that the form of the historic building - or buildings - can be distinguished from the new work
- Setting an additional story well back from the roof edge to ensure that the historic building's proportions and profile are not radically changed.
- Limit the size and scale of the addition so that is does not diminish or overpower the original building and/or the character of the historic district.
In the spirit of preserving the historic fabric, the City encourages the preservation of distinctive features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that serve to characterize and define properties of historic significance. Likewise, the City discourages the addition of inappropriate features or architectural elements from other buildings.
New additions and alterations should be designed and constructed so that the character-defining features of the historic building are not radically changed, obscured, damaged, or destroyed.
Features that may be important in defining the overall historic character of the building include:
- Siding: Clapboard, weatherboard, shingles, and other siding and decorative elements both functional and decorative.
- Windows: Functional and decorative features or windows that define the overall historic character of a building (e.g., a decorative window with an unusual shape, glazing patterns, or color; historic window types; window proportions).
- Entrances and porches: Entrances and porches, particularly when they occur on primary elevations.
- Roofs: Such roof features as roof shape, dormers, cupolas, eaves and chimneys, as well as the size, color, and patterning of the roofing material.
- Architectural features: Trim details, treatment of gables, overhangs.
Reference the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation for additions and rehabilitation of historic buildings.
The Long Beach Municipal Code Section 2.63.070 contains the following standards for review and approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness:
- The proposed change will not adversely affect any significant historical, cultural, architectural or aesthetic feature of the concerned property or of the historic district in which it is located, and is consistent with the spirit and intent of this chapter;
- The proposed change is consistent with or not incompatible with the architectural period of the building;
- The proposed change is compatible in architectural style with existing adjacent contributing structures in a historic district;
- The scale, massing, proportions, materials, colors, textures, fenestration, decorative features and details proposed are consistent with the period and/or compatible with adjacent structures.
It is advisable to homeowners considering significant alterations and additions to contact the Historic Preservation Officer to discuss the proposed project. Preliminary plans and concepts can be reviewed for compatibility with the CHC guidelines and the Municipal Code.
Historic Preservation Contact
M: | 8:00 AM - 4:00 PM |
T: | 8:00 AM - 4:00 PM |
W: | 9:00 AM - 4:00 PM |
TH: | 8:00 AM - 4:00 PM |
F: | 8:00 AM - 4:00 PM |
411 West Ocean Blvd., 3rd Floor
Long Beach, CA 90802
562.570.LBCD (5223)