REBUTTAL TO ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF MEASURE G

A common method used to get voter approval of tax increases, is the implied threat to cut city services. Don't be fooled!

Other California cities have modified the language and lowered the rate of the Utility User Tax (UUT), implying it would save residents money. By broadening the scope of taxable services, bills actually increased.

Measure G has been written in such a way that it seems to ignore the major reason this measure is now on the ballot. Even the "impartial analysis" by the City Attorney - which reads more like a second city ballot argument rather than an independent opinion - omits the fact that the courts may very well overturn their current ordinance because the city failed to ask voter approval before imposing this net tax increase.

Measure G Claims It's a fairness issue intended to equalize new and older technologies. However; this is also a tax increase plain and simple. Measure G will also allow the City of Long Beach to tax any future new technologies they choose without getting voter approval.

Measure G is unnecessary, since pending lawsuits and federal legislation will ultimately determine what taxes and services the City of Long Beach can legally charge residents for on their utility bills!

In the middle of our economic downturn, many Californians are suffering. Yet the City, County, State and School Districts are clamoring for more tax increases and bond money we do not have..

Vote No on "G"!

TOM STOUT
Long Beach Taxpayers Association